Bremerton Doesn't Need Two Auto Ferries. Just Ask the Navy
When Washington State Ferries announced a long-term plan to reduce Bremerton service to one boat, and eliminate evening service, (called Plan B), Kitsap residents and their state representatives let their collective knee jerk. WSF eventually 
Photo by Renee McMahon retracted revised the proposal, but that didn't stop a group of elected officials and concerned riders to draft their own "Plan C," which effectively preserves the status quo as far as routes and service are concerned.
Yesterday, they got their day in the sun. Representatives the group Citizens Write Plan C went in front of the legislature to pitch their plan and asked for more 144-car ferries.
Bremerton ferry riders are currently served by two ferries that carry both cars and passengers. But here's the rub: Running two auto ferries to Bremerton is a waste of time, taxpayer money, and steel. Clinging to its auto ferries isn't going to get what Bremerton really needs: fast, reliable, passenger-only service, and one passenger/auto ferry.
Let me explain.
After reconsidering the much-hated Plan B, WSF made an about-face and revised the plan to keep the Bremerton run at two boats retain evening service. But the reason wasn't because residents balked, and representatives pleaded. WSF made the change because, it explained, "The importance of evening and night service for major military employers such as Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and swing/night shift workers in Seattle led to the restoration of service in those time periods."
This is ironic, because it is the second time in as many years that WSF has played the shipyard card in justifying its service, but each time to an entirely different end. The first being when Bremerton riders asked for an adjusted schedule to fill the gap between the 10:30 p.m. and 12:50 a.m. sailings from Seattle to better accommodate witnessing the end of operas, plays, and Mariner's games. But, WSF chief David Moseley said they could not, because of the Seattle residents reliant on the 10:30 p.m. sailing to make the swing shift at Bremerton's PSNS. The number of swing shifters? According to WSF, it's about 40 to 75. When asked how 75 riders could so drastically dictate the lives of ferry-dependent residents in Kitsap County, WSF told Seattle Weekly to look a little closer at the Navy end of the remark. It's not just the 75 shipyard kids who are calling the shots, it's Rear Admiral James A. Symonds, Commander of Navy Region Northwest, who wrote a letter to David Moseley saying:
"I strongly recommend the State of Washington pursue a course of action that will maintain the service our Navy Sailors, civilian employees and families now depend on and enjoy."
He continued, "If a reduction of current services is unavoidable, I would encourage you to pursue restoration of passenger-only ferry service to fill any gaps in the schedule created by reduction. Many Sailors and civilians in the Navy workforce walk on the ferry, particularly to and from Bremerton. Therefore, passenger only service could be a satisfactory alternative." (Our boldface for emphasis.)
And that's the key issue. The Navy, the 75 riders commuting to the shipyard, and the thousands of Bremerton residents pleading for better evening service all have one thing in common: They want more frequent service to Seattle, not necessarily aboard boats that also carry cars.
After the four Steel Electric ferries were abruptly yanked from service in 2007 and WSF was left without backup boats, ferry riders have endured a waterborne commuter hell. None have felt it more acutely than those from Vashon and Bremerton. Legislators made it abundantly clear during the off season that this session would be crucial for the ferry system. But so much effort has been put into reacting against Plan B, and preserving the status quo, something crucial has been forgotten: We didn't like the status quo in the first place. And if this is our time to make change, let's ask for something we riders want, not something we don't.
Anyone who rides the boats off-peak knows that these 2,000-passenger boats run very light much of the time. The 12:50 a.m. from Seattle attracts fewer people than your average Access bus. And the 10:30 p.m. run — unless there's a Mariner's game or other mass attraction — isn't much fuller. In fact, according to sample data of several weeks of runs provided to SW by WSF, of the 14 runs a day from Seattle to Bremerton, six of them average fewer than 100 passengers per run; and only four of them averaged more than 300. As a transit system, it is extremely inefficient. Wouldn't it make more sense to move light runs on smaller, FASTER ferries that don't carry cars?
WSF and the state legislature still don't see it that way. They've made it abundantly clear that the state is out of the passenger-only business. They've said it's not sustainable. But, considering WSF's $1.3 to $3.2 billion projected deficit over the next two decades, the auto ferry business isn't looking much better. But, even if it's not WSF running the passenger-only ferries, someone should. In fact, Kitsap Transit, with help from earmarks from Sen. Patty Murray, is studying the feasibility a 120-passenger foot ferry between Bremerton and Seattle that would make the trip in only 32 minutes, roughly half the 60 minute ride we enjoy today.
Sure, there's no way a 120-passenger boat can compensate for the 2,000-passenger equivalent of a maritime Hummer. So, get several of them. Four passenger-only boats making the run in half the time as a 2,000-passenger auto ferry sounds great to me. But, Fred Chang, a long-time Bremerton ferry rider and Port Orchard City Councilman echoes the sentiments of many of his comrades.
"My main concern though is if we do get the passenger-only ferries, I don't know if anyone knows who would pay for it."
Bremerton City Councilman Adam Brockus contends that passenger-only service should supplement the auto ferries. But, I think it should be the other way around. Cars can drive around the Sound via the Tacoma Narrows Bridge if need be. Pedestrians can't.
People don't drive onto the Bremerton ferry because they HAVE TO. They do it because they can. Everyone I know who takes their car on the ferry doesn't have to. And even those with the farthest final destinations — Ballard, West Seattle, the U-District — could very easily catch a bus from downtown. The current problem is the lack of coordination with Metro. But, if there was a ferry arriving downtown every 15 minutes during the morning rush hour, coordination becomes a lot easier.
The tiny fraction of auto commuters who can't make it to their job via public transportation is holding back the rest of the region. There aren't very many of them, and they should drive around the Sound. It hardly takes more time—at least 80 minutes when you count loading, unloading, and waiting—or money—a gulp from your gas tank and the $4 bridge toll versus $20 round trip on the ferry). And if you dangle a 32-minute passenger-only commute in front of a drive-on commuter's face, I think you'll start changing some habits. Let's stop rewarding bad behavior (drive-ons) and start rewarding the rest (people who walk on).
I'm a daily patron of the Bremerton ferry and have been a resident of ferry-dependent communities for most of my life. I know that the thought of moving to a single auto ferry feels like a stick in the eye, one that underscores the lack of parity between Bremerton's and Bainbridge Island's ferry service. But, we're a different community than the others that live and die by the ferry schedule. Bremerton, meaning Kitsap, isn't an island. We have different needs. So if we're going to ask the legislature for something, let's ask for something we want. And if we're going to dream, let's dream big.
Editor's Note: This story has been edited from its original version to note that WSF's revised Plan B proposal moves the Bremerton run to a single auto ferry, not two auto ferries as was originally reported. Citizens for Plan C want two auto ferries. Yes, I'm saying I agree with Plan B. Basically.

8 comment(s)












T Beavan says:
I use my car in the course of my work in Seattle and therefore I NEED to drive on the Ferry. I wish I could pay less and not have to take a vehicle but that is not what is required for my job. I also can not afford to and do not want to live on that side of the water. Public transportation does not always run "full" no matter if it is a bus, train or ferry. The ferry to Bremerton is a vital transportation route from the Peninsula for work and recreation and needs to be maintained as the Marine Hwy System that it is, not a luxury. It is just as vital as The Bridge. Perhaps a system of billion $$ bridges is a good alternative- I don't think so.
Posted On: Saturday, Mar. 21 2009 @ 8:20AM
usedbookman says:
The primary problem is cost per passenger. When WSF ran pof's, their cost was $20. per passenger per round trip. That was with lower fuel an labor costs. One Issaquah class ferry can operate with the same number of crew as two of those cute little pofs. It would take ten pofs to move the same number of passengers as those cute little pofs. 32 minute crossings are illusionary until the Rich Passage wake problem is solved. It hasn't been. Bottom line, whwere will the subsidies be found so that regular working people, like me, can afford to ride these boats?
Posted On: Saturday, Mar. 21 2009 @ 8:53AM
Matt Ryan says:
Again doofus Seattle logic rears its myopic head. All roads don’t lead to Seattle, they pass through it. When I drive on the ferry, I’m going some place other than downtown Seattle. As for cutting back to one auto ferry, Chris Kornelis , by default, you have just given Tacoma all the service business because they would have to drive around. Yours is the same kind of logic I observed on the PSRC that counted trucks delivering freight and goods as Single Occupancy Vehicles.
What you don’t address is that a auto ferry is a very efficient deliverer of rush hour passengers. What you refuse to acknowledge is the earlier study that showed that passenger only ferries to be money losers. They bought the pofs and they were such money losers they’ve been sold. The game now is to give the money losers to the counties to run. Do you really believe that by having someone else do the same thing will give different results? Hey, your sales tax is pushing 10%, want to try for 15%?
Yes, the crew of an auto ferry will man 2 pofs. However the Hyak capacity is 2,500 vs 240 at best, given the wake considerations. I have seen more passengers waiting to get on an Issaquah class ferry than there was capacity. Those left behind were angry because they were missing a Seahawks game. How long will commuters put up with that on a daily basis? One would like to believe that most cities would jump at and support a transit system that delivers commuters in batches of thousands that doesn’t add to road congestion and puts a significant number in walking distance of work.
What ought to be going on in that mental dead zone called Seattle are efforts to move ferry riders seamlessly onto transit and off city streets. There is no direct link from the ferry terminal to the Metro bus tunnel. There are no dedicated places for passengers to be picked up in the vicinity of the terminal as happens in Bremerton. Bus schedules don’t mesh with ferry arrivals. There never has been any consideration to use air rights to lift off-loading auto traffic onto a replacement viaduct. If you look at the surface and tunnel options, there is no provision for ferry auto traffic period.
Posted On: Saturday, Mar. 21 2009 @ 4:22PM
serial catowner says:
It would be good to just forget the "high-speed" part of the passenger only ferry. High speed will only be attained at a high cost that makes the boats impractical.
The emphasis should be on frequency of service and extended hours. Serve car and truck traffic for an 8-hour portion of the day and use a smaller boat for early mornings and late nights. Or use a car ferry with room for less cars and more passengers. At some point commuter traffic from Bremerton will boom as people realize what a great place it is to live while you work in Seattle.
But just forget the whole "high-speed" part of the passenger-only boats. It leads directly to a bunch of other wrong ideas about how all of this will work.
Posted On: Sunday, Mar. 22 2009 @ 5:49AM
Chris K says:
@T Beavan: I'm not suggesting eliminating auto ferries to Bremerton, and cutting back to one ferry would probably scare those who don't need cars into leaving them at home.
@usedbookman: Like highways and busses, these ferries aren't for-profit endeavors. 70 percent of the operating costs of the ferries is collected at the fare box compared to 20 on a metro bus. And the old P.O. ferry scenario did not eliminate one auto ferry, saving $$$ there.
@mattryan: you're the extreme minority that should drive around. sorry.
@serial catowner: you make a very good, valid point. It's unfortunate that our slow, passenger-only ferries were sold at bargain-basement prices to the Bay Area.
Posted On: Sunday, Mar. 22 2009 @ 9:00AM
Ann Erickson says:
Too bad that the Navy doesn't care that the rest of us need two car ferries! I also cannot take public transportation on the Seattle side because I have multiple destinations that are not in Downtown Seattle!! I think it is very unfair that to go to the opera, ballet, plays etc I can only drive on because I have to drive around to get home! All this inconvenience for a shift at the shipyard that could be changed to meet the needs of the people who want to attend cultural, sports and educational events in Seattle. We were told at a Ferry Meeting that there are only 30 to 40 shift workers who need the 10:30 departure. Yes, we love the Navy presence but it is time for the Navy to be a better neighbor. The community has had a fair amount of problems because of the Navy. I went to meetings where the Navy asked us to build rentals because their people needed places to live. Now we have all these rentals but the Navy has built their own rentals and we have high vacancy rates. We have been good neighbors, they also need to be good neighbors and support the needs of the non-military community. This county has been wonderful for Navy families as we have affordable homes to buy here. Try that in San Diego!!
Posted On: Sunday, Mar. 22 2009 @ 9:10AM
Dennis Roberts says:
A possible solution is a bridge from Bremerton (around Manette or Illahee St Park) to Bainbridge Island. Then much of the traffic could be easily routed directly to the Bainbridge ferry terminal. Bremerton could still run one drive-on ferry but with a terminal only 20-25 minutes away most traffic would then flow through a ferry that takes half the time.
Dennis Roberts
Bremerton
Posted On: Sunday, Mar. 22 2009 @ 12:06PM
Rob says:
Dennis - this obviously has been the answer for scores of years. Bainbridge Island has ALWAYS vetoed it. It still needs to be done. A car ferry would make sense for those times of day when its huge walk on passenger capacity is needed. The next interesting economic study would be to establish when buses to Winslow would be more cost effective. It would really be nice to have 3 car ferries available for the Bremerton and Winslow runs, to be deployed as needed, and augmented by passenger only.
Posted On: Saturday, May. 16 2009 @ 12:00PM