Microsoft Declares Itself Still Innovative, Not at All Clumsy
Yesterday, Dick Brass, an ex-reporter who once led the charge to build tablet PCs and e-books at Microsoft, published a fairly devastating critique of his former company in The New York Times. In an op-ed, Brass portrayed the software giant as a company where visionary thinking goes to wilt and die. A product, he wrote, of having "developed a system to thwart innovation."
"Pay no attention to the former employee behind the curtain!"
Microsoft, as you'd expect, disagrees with Brass' assessment of their creativity snuffing.
In a rebuttal blog post, corporate vice president of communications Frank X. Shaw says that when Brass writes that Microsoft is a "clumsy, uncompetitive innovator" it might be because he doesn't understand how it thinks about innovation.
"At the highest level, we think about innovation in relation to its ability to have a positive impact in the world," writes Shaw. "For Microsoft, it is not sufficient to simply have a good idea, or a great idea, or even a cool idea. We measure our work by its broad impact."
Flacks are immune to saying that their companies are also in the business of being a business (i.e. making a ton of money). Still, it'd be refreshing if Shaw had just said Great and cool is all we need, now who's coming along for the ride?
Write Comment
Email to Friend
Print Article
